Database
Marketing differs from traditional marketing in that the traditional approach is
usually about generating the next sale, while database marketing is more about
generating future sales; hopefully across the entire lifetime of the prospect or
customer.
For
example, let's say your product or service typically sells for $60, the return
on investment analysis of traditional marketing is focused on that $60 sale, and
success is largely viewed on the basis of generating as many
$60 sales as quickly as possible.
However,
let's think about the reported historical statistic¹ that for every $100 we
spend on advertising products and services, less than $20 is dedicated to
retaining the customers we already have. That means $80 out of every $100 is
dedicated to acquiring new customers—convincing prospects to try your product or
services for the first time or to switch back from a competitor's product.
With such a high percentage of time and money is invested in trying to find and
convince new customers, the customers that we have already acquired are greatly
ignored.
Since we
know it is much more efficient to generate incremental sales from existing
customers, wouldn't you agree that spending 80% of your marketing resources to
attract new customer sales
is backwards? More often than not, marketers reward the hardest to find,
hardest to acquire, hardest to keep customers with offers and incentives, while
the most consistent customers, who have paid full price for products and
services, are not rewarded for their patronage. Doesn't it make sense to show
appreciation to the most loyal of all customers?